Hamlet Knew Exactly What He Should Do and Spent Five Acts Explaining Why He Had Not Done It Yet
Shakespeare gave Hamlet the simplest possible mission: your uncle killed your father, avenge him. The ghost appears. The ghost speaks. The instructions are clear. And Hamlet spends five acts thinking about whether to do it, how to do it, whether the ghost is reliable, whether action is meaningful, whether existence itself is worth the trouble, and whether a bare bodkin might resolve the whole mess more efficiently than a sword. He is the most brilliant procrastinator in literary history, a man of extraordinary intellect who uses that intellect to generate reasons for inaction that are so philosophically sophisticated they have kept scholars arguing for four centuries.
Dr. Margreta de Grazia of the University of Pennsylvania, in her study of Hamlet and temporal identity, has argued that the play's enduring fascination lies not in the revenge plot but in the delay, in the space between the command and the execution, where Hamlet lives, thinks, and talks. The delay is the play. Everything interesting about Hamlet happens in the gap between what he knows he should do and what he actually does, and that gap contains the first modern consciousness in literature.
To Be or Not to Be
The soliloquy is the most famous passage in English, and its subject is not revenge but existence. Hamlet stands alone and asks whether living is better than dying, whether the suffering of consciousness is worth enduring when the alternative, sleep, offers relief. This is not a man planning murder. This is a man questioning the value of being alive, and the question is so honestly posed, so free of the rhetorical posturing that characters use to justify their actions, that it has survived four centuries as the definitive statement of human doubt.
The Play Within the Play
Hamlet stages a play to confirm Claudius's guilt, which is either a clever trap or another delay disguised as strategy. He already believes the ghost. He already suspects Claudius. The play within the play gives him proof, but it also gives him another reason not to act immediately, because now he needs to observe Claudius's reaction, analyze it, and draw conclusions. Hamlet turns action into research and research into further contemplation, and the cycle continues until the final scene when death, not decision, finally resolves the plot.
Everyone Dies
The ending of Hamlet is a bloodbath. Claudius, Gertrude, Laertes, and Hamlet all die within minutes. The delay has produced not one death but four, which is Shakespeare's darkest joke about procrastination: inaction does not prevent consequences. It compounds them.
✓ Free · No signup required