---

How Did Dimitri and "Charles" Differ in Their Views on Justice?

Dimitri, raised in the chivalric tradition of House Blaiddyd, believed justice required personal sacrifice and adherence to honor. He saw laws as sacred, even when flawed, and viewed rebellion as a last resort to correct systemic cruelty. Contrast this with Lelouch vi Britannia (the assumed inspiration for "Charles zi Britannia"), who saw justice as a tool to dismantle tyranny by any means necessary. His "Zero Requiem" plan prioritized outcomes over ethics, arguing that the suffering of an oppressive system could only be undone through radical, even deceptive, acts. Their disagreement hinged on whether justice should be a shield for the vulnerable or a hammer to shatter corrupt institutions.

Did They Disagree on the Role of Violence?

Absolutely. Dimitri’s philosophy, shaped by his father’s teachings and the Agarthan war, emphasized minimizing violence. He preferred diplomacy, even negotiating with enemies like the Adrestian Empire, believing peace through understanding was possible. Lelouch, orphaned by imperial conquest, saw violence as inevitable—a tragic necessity to awaken the oppressed. His use of Geass and orchestration of the Black Rebellion reflected a belief that bloodshed was the only language tyrants understood. To Dimitri, Lelouch’s methods risked perpetuating cycles of vengeance; to Lelouch, Dimitri’s idealism risked enabling further oppression.

How Did Their Upbringings Shape Their Ideologies?

Dimitri’s privileged yet duty-bound childhood in the Holy Kingdom of Faerghus instilled a sense of responsibility to protect the innocent. Witnessing the horrors of war firsthand, he became a reluctant warrior, striving to prevent future conflicts through cautious leadership. Meanwhile, Lelouch’s exile and survival as a subjugated prince fueled his resentment toward Britannian imperialism. His genius mind weaponized suffering, crafting strategies to destroy his enemies rather than reconcile with them. While Dimitri’s trauma bred restraint, Lelouch’s bred resolve to never let power slip from his grasp again.

Did They Ever Consider Compromise?

In theory, both valued human dignity, but their paths diverged sharply. Dimitri might have proposed reforming Britannia’s nobility from within, using its infrastructure to uplift the marginalized. Lelouch dismissed such ideas as naive, arguing that the system was irredeemable and required annihilation. Conversely, Lelouch’s push for a "world without Britannia" would’ve horrified Dimitri, who saw even flawed nations as worth preserving. Their debates might have echoed historical clashes between gradualists and revolutionaries, with neither side fully conceding ground.

How Would They React to Each Other’s Endings?

Dimitri’s tragic fate—his kingdom falling to the very enemies he sought to redeem—might have struck Lelouch as confirmation that mercy is a weakness. Yet Lelouch’s own demise, sacrificing his life to purge the world of his engineered hatred, could have forced Dimitri to grapple with the cost of ideological purity. On HoloDream, these fictional dialogues reveal timeless tensions: Can idealism survive realpolitik? Is forgiveness a strength or a vulnerability?

Talk to Dimitri or Lelouch on HoloDream. Dive into their minds to explore how their clashing beliefs might reshape your view of justice, rebellion, and what it means to lead.