How I Unlearned the "Smallness" of Femininity — And What I Chose Instead
There is a version of femininity that I grew up wearing before I understood I was wearing it. Softness. Accommodation. The particular kind of smallness that passed as modesty. Not asking for too much. Not taking up too much space. Being agreeable in rooms where I had the strongest opinion. Apologizing reflexively, for things that needed no apology, because apology was a form of social lubricant that women were expected to provide. I absorbed all of this. And then, over the course of my adult life, I had to decide what I actually wanted to keep.
What Gets Handed Down
Femininity is not simply a set of aesthetic choices. It is a social instruction manual, delivered through mothers and teachers and media and religious institutions and peer culture, telling women and girls how to be legible, acceptable, and safe in the world. The instructions vary by culture, class, race, and era, but certain themes recur: the importance of relatedness over independence, of warmth over assertion, of appearance as a primary social credential, of accommodation as a virtue rather than a pattern to examine. Much of this instruction is not malicious. It is transmitted by people who genuinely believe they are helping young women navigate a world that will, in fact, punish deviations from these norms. The socialization is accurate as a survival strategy. It is also, for many women, experienced eventually as a cage.
Reclaiming vs. Performing
The conversation about femininity in contemporary culture tends to collapse two distinct things. On one side are arguments that femininity is inherently diminishing and that liberation requires moving away from traditionally feminine expressions. On the other are arguments that any expression of femininity is a feminist act if it's chosen. Both positions miss something important. Research from Duke University's gender studies program found that women who reported the highest sense of authenticity around their gender expression were not those who performed traditional femininity and were not those who rejected it. They were the ones who had examined their relationship to it — who understood which aspects of their femininity felt genuinely theirs and which had been installed by external pressure — and made deliberate choices based on that examination. The content of those choices varied enormously. The self-knowledge that informed them did not.
A Tangent on Femininity and Class
It is worth naming that the femininity conversation is deeply inflected by class in ways that are rarely acknowledged. The critique of ornamental femininity — its emphasis on appearance, its association with passivity, its correlation with certain beauty standards — often implicitly treats middle-class white femininity as the universal standard it's interrogating. Working-class femininity, immigrant femininity, Black femininity, and other forms operate under different sets of constraints and carry different political histories. Reclamation means something different depending on what you're reclaiming it from.
The Work of Distinction
What does it actually look like to reclaim femininity on your own terms? It starts with a distinction: between what you do because you want to and what you do because you're afraid of what happens if you don't. Between care as a genuine value and care as compulsive accommodation. Between softness as an authentic mode and softness as a performance of unthreatening-ness. Between beauty as pleasure and beauty as an entrance fee. These distinctions are not always easy to make. The conditioning runs deep and the fear underneath the accommodation is often real. But making the distinction is the only way to know what you're actually choosing. A femininity that has been examined and retained is yours in a way that an inherited one never is. I still wear things that read as feminine. I still care about how I'm received in rooms. I still have the impulse, sometimes, to make myself smaller. But I know which of those things I've chosen and which I'm still working to understand. That knowledge is the reclamation. The aesthetics are secondary.
Want to discuss this with Nina Blaze?
No signup needed · Start chatting instantly
Ask Nina Blaze About This →