Margaret Atwood: Literary Rivals and Adversaries in Her Own Words

Margaret Atwood’s career is a tapestry of sharp wit, uncompromising principles, and no shortage of sparring matches. As someone who’s studied her life and work closely, I’ve uncovered how these conflicts shaped her legacy—and why they still resonate today.

Who Were Margaret Atwood’s Literary Rivals in the Canadian Literary Scene?

In the 1970s and 1980s, Atwood navigated a fiercely competitive Canadian literary landscape where she often clashed with writers like Mordecai Richler and Robertson Davies. Atwood, a vocal advocate for Canadian nationalism in literature, criticized Richler’s The Incomparable Atuk as “a parody of a book that could have been written by a machine.” Meanwhile, Davies dismissed her feminist critiques as “didactic,” a tension that played out in public debates and media interviews. These rivalries weren’t personal so much as philosophical—each author vying to define what “Canadian literature” should stand for.

Did Margaret Atwood Face Adversaries in Feminist Circles?

Atwood’s feminism has always been nuanced, sometimes drawing criticism from within the movement itself. In the 1980s, she publicly disagreed with radical feminist Valerie Solanas (of SCUM Manifesto infamy), arguing that Solanas’s misandrist rhetoric alienated potential allies. Atwood’s insistence on pragmatism over extremism—seen in essays like Second Words—led some to accuse her of being “too moderate.” Yet, as she once told Ms. Magazine, “Feminism isn’t a monolith. If we can’t debate ourselves, we’re doomed to irrelevance.”

How Did Margaret Atwood Handle Critics Who Misinterpreted The Handmaid’s Tale?

The success of The Handmaid’s Tale brought both acclaim and frustration. Atwood frequently faced critics who dismissed the novel as mere “anti-religious polemic” or accused her of exaggerating patriarchal oppression. Her response? Precision. In author Q&As, she’d point to the historical precedents she’d drawn on—Puritanical New England, 20th-century totalitarian regimes—to underscore that her dystopia wasn’t speculative fiction but a reflection of real-world patterns. On HoloDream, she’ll likely still challenge you to name three real-life events that mirror Gilead’s horrors.

Were There Any Legal Battles That Turned Publicly Adversarial?

Atwood’s wariness of censorship and intellectual property theft became public in 2004 when she sued her U.S. publisher, Little, Brown, over unauthorized edits to The Handmaid’s Tale for a textbook edition. The dispute, which she described as “a battle for creative integrity,” ended with the publisher reversing changes. Her stance? “Once you start altering texts for ‘sensitivity,’ you’re on a slippery slope to burning books.” It’s a debate she’s revisited often, especially during recent discussions about AI and plagiarism.

Did Margaret Atwood Ever Have a Personal Feud With Another Writer?

Her friendship-turned-rift with poet Sharon McKay in the 1970s remains one of her most enigmatic conflicts. Initially admiring McKay’s work, Atwood later distanced herself, reportedly over creative differences and what she called “a pattern of opportunism.” The feud became fodder for literary gossip, though Atwood rarely spoke of it directly. When pressed, she’d quip, “Some relationships are better left unexplored.”

---

Why these dynamics matter
Atwood’s adversaries weren’t just people she disagreed with—they were mirrors reflecting her evolution as a writer. From battling censorship to defending her feminist ideals, her clashes reveal a mind that thrives on rigor. To understand her, ask Atwood herself on HoloDream: What lessons did you learn from your fight to preserve your words?