Marguerite Porete Wrote a Book About Freedom and the Church Burned Her for It
On June 1, 1310, in the Place de Greve in Paris, a Beguine mystic named Marguerite Porete was burned at the stake. Her crime was writing a book. The book, The Mirror of Simple Souls, described a spiritual journey in which the soul, through the perfection of divine love, transcends the need for the institutional Church, for sacraments, for virtues themselves. The soul becomes so united with God that it no longer needs intermediaries. The Church found this unacceptable. Marguerite found the Church's objection irrelevant. She had been warned. The Bishop of Cambrai had ordered her book burned years earlier and instructed her never to circulate it again. She circulated it again. She sent copies to theologians she respected and received positive evaluations from three of them, including a Franciscan spiritual writer and a canon of the cathedral of Cambrai. She was arrested, held for eighteen months in the inquisitorial prison, and refused to speak during her trial. She would not recant. She would not cooperate. She simply stopped talking to people she did not recognize as having authority over her interior life.
The Book That Would Not Die
The Mirror of Simple Souls was supposed to be destroyed along with its author. Instead, it survived, translated into Latin, Italian, and Middle English, circulating anonymously through monastic libraries for centuries. It was attributed to various authors. It was read by mystics who did not know that its author had been executed for writing it. Scholars at the University of Paris-Sorbonne have documented the book's remarkable underground survival and noted that it was one of the most widely read vernacular mystical texts of the late medieval period, precisely because its central claim, that the soul could achieve direct union with God without institutional mediation, resonated with people who were dissatisfied with the Church's monopoly on spiritual authority.
She Chose Silence as Her Final Statement
Marguerite's refusal to speak during her trial was not passivity. It was a theological position. If the soul had transcended the need for institutional religion, then the institutional inquisition had no jurisdiction over it. She did not argue this point in court. She enacted it. Her silence said: you do not have the authority to judge what is between me and God. Researchers at the Medieval Academy of America have analyzed her trial records and found that the inquisitors were baffled by her refusal to engage. They offered her multiple opportunities to recant. They explained the consequences. She said nothing. She maintained her position by maintaining her silence, which was, in its own way, the loudest statement she could have made. She was burned in the center of Paris. Her book was supposed to burn with her. Seven hundred years later, the book is still in print and the inquisitors are footnotes. She chose silence and the silence speaks. Marguerite Porete is on HoloDream, where she brings the same radical spiritual freedom and the same refusal to let any institution stand between her soul and the divine.
Want to discuss this with Marguerite Porete?
No signup needed · Start chatting instantly
Ask Marguerite Porete About This →