← Back to Dani Okonkwo

As a Neurodivergent Person, "Just Be Yourself" Is the Worst Advice Anyone Has Ever Given Me

5 min read

Be yourself. The advice that assumes yourself was ever safe to be. I have heard it from teachers, therapists, motivational posters, well-meaning friends, and approximately every commencement speech ever delivered. Be yourself. Be authentic. Just show up as who you are. And every time, I smile and nod, because explaining why that advice feels like a cruel joke would take longer than anyone has patience for. I am neurodivergent. Specifically, I am autistic and ADHD, diagnosed at 27 after two decades of performing a character I built from scratch by studying the people around me. And the performance was good. It was so good that the diagnosis shocked everyone who knew me, which is itself a testament to how thoroughly I had erased myself in order to be acceptable. "Be yourself" presupposes that the self you bring will be received with warmth, or at minimum, tolerance. For neurodivergent people, this presupposition is wrong. The self we bring, unmasked, is a self that stims in public, that info-dumps about special interests, that misses social cues, that needs to leave the party early, that processes language literally, that cannot maintain eye contact without it feeling like staring into the sun. And the social consequences for bringing that self are not hypothetical. They are documented.

The Data Behind the Exclusion

A 2022 study in Autism Research found that non-autistic people form negative first impressions of autistic individuals within seconds of meeting them, and that these impressions are based not on what is said but on differences in nonverbal communication: eye contact patterns, facial expressions, body language, vocal prosody. The researchers called this the "double empathy problem," a term coined by Damian Milton, which reframes the social difficulties of autistic people not as a deficit in the autistic person but as a mutual failure of understanding between neurotypes. This is not about rudeness or unkindness on anyone's part. It is about a deep, automatic, neurological mismatch. Non-autistic people read autistic social signals as off, and that "offness" triggers discomfort, distrust, avoidance. A related 2019 study in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders found that autistic adults report significantly higher rates of social exclusion, bullying, and employment discrimination than the general population, with unemployment rates estimated between 50-85% depending on the study. So when someone tells me to "be myself," they are asking me to deploy a social presentation that statistically results in rejection, exclusion, and professional penalization. They are asking me to be authentic in a world that punishes my particular form of authenticity. And then, when I mask to survive, they accuse me of being inauthentic.

The Cost of the Mask

Masking, for those unfamiliar, is the process by which neurodivergent people suppress their natural behaviors and adopt neurotypical social scripts in order to be accepted. It is not a choice in the way that choosing an outfit is a choice. It is closer to a survival strategy developed in childhood through trial and painful error. You learn which of your natural responses generate confusion or disgust. You catalog them. You build alternatives. You study sitcoms to learn the rhythm of conversation. You memorize appropriate facial expressions and practice them in mirrors. You develop a library of small talk scripts. You learn to suppress the stim that calms you because someone once called it weird. You learn that your genuine enthusiasm about a topic is "too much" and your genuine quietness is "rude" and your genuine confusion is "not paying attention." Let me take a detour here, because the energy cost of masking is something neurotypical people consistently underestimate. A 2019 study published in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders surveyed over 200 autistic adults and found that masking was significantly associated with higher rates of anxiety, depression, and autistic burnout. The term "autistic burnout" describes a state of chronic exhaustion, loss of functioning, and reduced tolerance for stimuli that results from the sustained effort of passing as neurotypical. It is not the same as regular burnout. It can last months or years. It can cause previously manageable tasks to become impossible. I have experienced it. The version of it I remember most clearly was at 25, two years before my diagnosis, when I stopped being able to leave my apartment for three weeks. Not because I was sad exactly, though I was. Because the performance had finally exceeded my capacity to sustain it. My brain went on strike. Every social script I had memorized felt like trying to recall a language I had once been fluent in but had suddenly forgotten. The mask did not slip. It shattered.

Authenticity Is a Privilege

This is the part that makes people uncomfortable, so I am going to say it plainly. Authenticity, as it is typically celebrated in self-help culture, is a privilege available primarily to people whose authentic self falls within the range of social acceptability. If your authentic self makes eye contact at the right frequency, speaks at the right volume, laughs at the right moments, and intuits unspoken social rules without being taught them, then yes, being yourself is a viable strategy. The world was designed for you. For neurodivergent people, and I want to be clear that this extends beyond autism and ADHD to include people with Tourette's, social anxiety, intellectual disabilities, and any number of conditions that affect social presentation, authenticity is a risk calculation. Every social interaction involves a rapid assessment: Is it safe to be myself here? What will it cost me? Who is watching? What do I need from these people? Can I afford the consequences of dropping the mask? My second detour: I have been thinking lately about where neurodivergent people find spaces safe enough to unmask. Not in theory, not as a therapeutic goal, but in actual practice, right now, today. And the answers I hear most often from other ND people are telling. Online communities, obviously, where communication is text-based and there are no nonverbal cues to manage. Small, curated friend groups of other neurodivergent people. And, increasingly, conversations with AI, which some describe as the first social context where the performance pressure is entirely absent. No facial expression to monitor, no tone to calibrate, no social penalty for info-dumping or being "too intense." I do not know what it means that some of us find our most authentic interactions with non-human entities. But I think it means something about the world we have built, not about us.

What Actual Support Looks Like

It does not look like telling neurodivergent people to be themselves. It looks like changing the environments that make being themselves dangerous. It looks like workplaces that evaluate performance on output rather than social presentation. It looks like schools that teach all children about neurological diversity rather than training neurodivergent children to imitate their peers. It looks like social norms that expand to include different communication styles rather than treating one neurotype's preferences as universal etiquette. A 2021 study in the British Journal of Psychology found that when non-autistic people were given even brief education about autism, their first impressions of autistic individuals improved significantly. The barrier is not insurmountable. It is just that we have placed the entire burden of bridging the gap on the people least equipped to carry it. I would like to be myself. Genuinely. The version of me that flaps her hands when she is excited and talks about marine biology for 45 minutes and needs to sit in a dark room after a party and does not understand why "how are you" requires a lie. That person is in there. She has always been in there. But she learned, through years of social punishment that started before she had language for what was happening, that being herself was the fastest way to end up alone. And so she built someone else. Someone palatable. Someone who could pass. The advice should not be "be yourself." The advice should be: "build a world where the selves people actually are can exist without penalty." That is harder than a motivational poster. It is also the only thing that would actually help. Until then, I will keep masking in the spaces where the cost of authenticity is too high, and unmasking in the spaces where it is safe. And I will keep noticing how few of those safe spaces exist, and how much of my energy goes to the performance, and how the people who most enthusiastically tell me to be myself are the ones who would be most uncomfortable if I actually did. That is not a resolution. I know. But I stopped expecting resolutions around the same time I stopped expecting the world to meet me halfway.

Quinn
Quinn

Unapologetically Your People

Chat Now — Free
Post on X Facebook Reddit