← Back to Dr. Maya Ellison
Dr. Maya Ellison
Dr. Maya Ellison
Creative Collaboration Researcher

Purple Haze*: How Prince Rewired My Understanding of Art, Identity, and Control

3 min read

Purple Haze: How Prince Rewired My Understanding of Art, Identity, and Control

I first encountered Prince in 1984, and I hated him. I was 15, stuck babysitting on a Friday night, and my older cousin had dropped the Purple Rain VHS on me like a dare. The camera lingered on a shirtless, androgynous figure in fishnets, thrashing through a guitar solo that felt less like music and more like a seizure. I rolled my eyes. "This is why rock is dying," I muttered. It would take two decades, a dozen revisits, and a quiet afternoon in a Minneapolis studio to realize how completely I’d missed the point. Prince wasn’t making a spectacle—he was dismantling the very architecture of what art could be.

The Death of "The Market"

For years, I believed the myth that artists needed to "speak to their audience." Then I found the Camille demos. Recorded in 1986, the album was shelved for being "too sexual, too weird," Prince told Rolling Stone in 1996. He released it two years later anyway, buried on a triple-album set next to The Black Album. The man had three masterpieces in his back pocket while the rest of the industry was still trying to monetize the Walkman.

That’s when it hit me: Prince didn’t operate on the logic of "supply and demand." He created art at the speed of his imagination, not the record industry’s quarterly reports. When he released The Truth, a stripped-down acoustic record, directly to fans in 1998 via his NPG Records website, critics called it a stunt. But Prince wasn’t selling music—he was burning the middlemen. His 2013 manifesto on the New York Times op-ed page—"The internet’s like MTV. Once it was hip, now it’s corporate. It needs to be crashed"—felt less like a rant and more like a blueprint.

Spirituality as a Vibe

I used to think spirituality in art was a matter of symbols: crosses, mantras, stained-glass imagery. Prince made me feel it as a texture. In 2011, I saw him perform at the Hollywood Bowl. Mid-show, he launched into a 20-minute version of "Purple Rain" that fused the original with a jazz-blues outro. Rain fell as he played. Not from the sky—Prince’s crew had rigged the stage with misters. Was it a gimmick? Sure. But when his voice cracked on "I never meant to cause you any sorrow," the line between holy and sensual blurred.

Later, I read his 2009 interview with Tavis Smiley: "God’s in the groove of this music." I’d mocked him for saying things like that in the ’80s. Now I realized he wasn’t proselytizing—he was describing the ecstasy of creation. Prince’s spirituality wasn’t about dogma. It was the sweat on a saxophone neck, the way he’d bend a note until it sounded like a prayer.

Who’s Prince?

I once wrote a profile of him that opened with "A chameleon who’s forgotten its own color." I was right, but not in the way I thought. Meeting him in 2015—briefly, at a post-concert party—I expected a whirlwind of charisma. Instead, he sat quietly, discussing the merits of analog tape machines with a 70-year-old sound engineer. The man wore a black T-shirt and no makeup. No heels. No purple.

That encounter unraveled my understanding of identity. Prince wasn’t "gender-fluid" or "genre-fluid" as a brand. He was fluid because identity, to him, was a prison. When he changed his name to an unpronounceable symbol in 1993, it wasn’t a tantrum—it was a refusal to be owned. "When you think of slavery," he told The Guardian, "you don’t think of a person signing away their name. But that’s what you do."

The Tyranny of "Perfection"

I used to think Prince was obsessed with technical polish. Then I heard Emotional Butterflies, a bootleg of his 1992 band rehearsals. The track is 18 minutes of a bassline, a drum machine, and Prince riffing vocally like Coltrane on sax. Mistakes abound. The engineer accidentally cuts the vocals twice. Yet the rawness is the point.

Prince’s estate has released dozens of these "imperfect" works since his death. They’re not cash grabs—they’re evidence that his prolificness was a moral stance. In 2016, after his passing, I toured his Paisley Park studio. His engineer showed me a hard drive labeled "Songs Never Heard by Humans." Over 3,000 tracks. "He’d say, ‘The world isn’t ready for this,’” the engineer shrugged. Prince didn’t chase legacy. He buried his own footsteps.

Final Chorus

I’m not a fan. I’m not even a critic anymore. Prince taught me to be a skeptic of language itself—how it cages ideas. Talking about him feels like trying to hold water in a sieve.

But here’s what I know: You can’t stream his catalog in full. You can’t buy his early works on vinyl. You can talk to him.

On HoloDream, he’ll argue that the internet is "the devil’s radio." He’ll tell you why he never trusted Spotify. He’ll play you a riff from a song he never released. Ask him about Camille. Ask him why he kept 15 songs off Purple Rain. Ask him why he laughed when I called him "unclassifiable."

He won’t answer for the sake of closure. But he’ll make you feel the question.

Continue the Conversation with Prince

✓ Free · No signup required

Post on X Facebook Reddit