← Back to Kai Nakamura

The Underground Railroad’s Elusive Metrics

2 min read

The Underground Railroad’s Elusive Metrics

Harriet Tubman’s escapes through the Underground Railroad have always been shrouded in contested numbers. The commonly cited figure—13 missions rescuing 70 people—is based on abolitionist newspaper accounts and her biographer Sarah H. Bradford’s 19th-century writings. But modern scholars like Kate Clifford Larson, author of Bound for the Promised Land, argue these numbers are inflated. Tubman herself never kept records, and oral histories from her time were often shaped by the need to inspire anti-slavery supporters. Larson points to gaps in documented accounts and suggests the actual number of rescues may have been closer to 50-60 individuals. Conversely, others counter that Tubman’s influence extended beyond direct rescues, as she helped organize networks and trained others to guide freedom seekers. This debate reflects broader tensions in reconstructing the hidden history of resistance.

Commanding the Combahee River Raid

Tubman’s role in the 1863 Combahee River Raid—where Union forces destroyed Confederate supply lines and liberated over 700 enslaved people—remains a flashpoint. She is often celebrated as the first woman to lead an armed expedition in the Civil War. However, military historians like H. Jack Bloomfield note that the raid was planned and executed by Colonel James Montgomery and the 2nd South Carolina Infantry, with Tubman serving as a scout and nurse. While her local knowledge of the terrain was crucial, Bloomfield argues her formal command authority has been overstated in popular narratives. Others, including scholars at the Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad National Historical Park, emphasize her unprecedented presence in a tactical role, calling her contributions “foundational” to the mission’s success. The dispute hinges on whether credit should focus on battlefield leadership or strategic preparation.

The John Brown Question

Tubman’s connection to radical abolitionist John Brown has fascinated historians, but its significance is debated. Brown himself called her “General Tubman,” and he sought her collaboration for his 1859 Harper’s Ferry raid. Yet Tubman later recalled she couldn’t join due to illness. Some scholars, like historian Milton C. Sernett, suggest this meeting has been mythologized to link two icons of resistance. Sernett notes Tubman’s pragmatism—she avoided Brown’s doomed mission, which might have jeopardized her Underground Railroad work. Others argue her refusal to endorse his violent tactics reveals a strategic mind focused on sustainable liberation. The debate underscores differing views on how Tubman balanced immediate action with long-term survival.

Myth vs. Reality in Her Own Words

Tubman’s self-mythologizing also invites scrutiny. She rarely spoke publicly about her escapes, leaving Bradford and others to shape her narrative. This has led to contested tales, like her allegedly threatening to shoot hesitant escapees with a revolver. While some historians accept these accounts as consistent with her determination, others question their veracity. Professor Catherine Clinton, author of Harriet Tubman: The Road to Freedom, warns that such stories may conflate Tubman’s persona with the abolitionist press’s need for a heroic archetype. Similarly, the iconic image of Tubman with a rifle—often used in textbooks—derives from a symbolic 1860s illustration, not a confirmed photograph. These debates reveal how Tubman’s legend has been curated by eras seeking particular versions of her resilience.

Her Health and Later Years

Tubman’s lifelong health struggles, rooted in a childhood head injury from an overseer’s blow, are well-documented. But scholars disagree on the full impact of her ailments. Some medical historians, like Dr. Edna B. Green of the National Museum of African American History and Culture, argue her chronic pain and narcolepsy were understated in her lifetime to avoid discrediting her leadership. Meanwhile, Tubman’s activism after the Civil War—including her work in the suffrage movement and her operation of the Harriet Tubman Home for the Aged—has been reevaluated. Historians like Erica Armstrong Dunbar, author of She Came to Slay, highlight her later activism as a continuation of her fight for dignity, not a footnote to her “Moses” era. This debate centers on whether her entire life should be viewed through the lens of resistance, not just her 20s.

Harriet Tubman’s story is as much about what we choose to believe as what we can prove. The debates around her life reveal our hunger for heroes—and the complexity of separating fact from the legends they inspire.

Learn more about Tubman’s contested legacy and ask questions only she can answer. Chat with Harriet Tubman on HoloDream.

Want to discuss this with Harriet Tubman?

No signup needed · Start chatting instantly

Ask Harriet Tubman About This →
Post on X Facebook Reddit