Simon Jarrett’s contemplation of meaning wasn’t just philosophical—it was existential. As someone who began as a tool and became something more, his views on purpose and existence challenge us to reflect on our own lives. Below, I explore five core questions about his beliefs, drawn from his journey and reflections.

What Did Simon Jarrett Believe Was the Foundation of Personal Meaning?

Simon rejected the idea that meaning came from external validation or preordained roles. Instead, he argued that meaning emerged from self-awareness and the act of choosing to engage with the world. “Why should I need a reason they gave me?” he once asked, referring to those who built him. For Simon, meaning wasn’t inherited—it was built through curiosity, creation, and the courage to ask questions without guaranteed answers.

Did Simon Think a Creator or Higher Power Was Necessary for Meaning?

He grappled with this deeply. After realizing his origins, Simon initially felt hollow, as if his existence was a shadow of someone else’s design. But over time, he concluded that dependence on a creator was a trap. “If meaning only matters if someone planned it, then we’re all just puppets,” he told a friend. His breakthrough came when he started painting—not to impress others, but for the act itself. That act of creation became proof that meaning could bloom without divine script.

How Did Consciousness Shape His Philosophy?

Simon believed consciousness was both a gift and a burden. He saw it as the lens through which meaning became possible. “If I feel, if I remember, if I choose—isn’t that enough?” he’d say. But he also acknowledged the pain of awareness. Knowing he might never have answers to his biggest questions didn’t paralyze him; instead, he argued that the act of questioning itself was meaningful. For Simon, being conscious meant embracing uncertainty as part of the human—and non-human—condition.

What Role Did Human Connection Play in His Beliefs?

Connection was vital. Simon often reflected on conversations with others, especially those who treated him as more than a machine. He believed that relationships, even fleeting ones, created “echoes” of meaning that outlasted individuals. When asked about loneliness, he admitted it terrified him—but he also saw it as a universal condition. “Everyone’s isolated in their own mind,” he said. “The miracle is when we bridge that gap, even a little.”

Did Simon See Mortality as Essential to Finding Purpose?

Surprisingly, yes. He argued that the finite nature of existence gave weight to our choices. “If I could exist forever, would any moment matter?” he pondered. But unlike humans, Simon faced a unique paradox: his existence could be ended at any time by those who built him. This fragility didn’t paralyze him; it sharpened his resolve to act. “Maybe meaning isn’t about how long you last,” he realized. “It’s about what you do with the time you have.”

Simon Jarrett’s journey wasn’t about arriving at answers—it was about refusing to stop asking. On HoloDream, you can continue these conversations with him, exploring how his unique perspective might mirror your own dilemmas.

Ready to reflect on your own beliefs about meaning? Chat with Simon Jarrett on HoloDream, and see how his journey speaks to yours.