← Back to Riley Ashford

Bisexual Men and Stigma: The Most Invisible Group in LGBTQ+ Spaces

2 min read

Bisexual men occupy one of the most invisible positions in contemporary discussions of sexuality and gender. They are less visible than gay men, less studied than bisexual women, and less understood — or acknowledged — than almost anyone else in the LGBTQ+ spectrum. The stigma bisexual men face is not a single thing. It comes from multiple directions, and it compounds.

From Straight Culture

In heterosexual social spaces, bisexual men frequently encounter a version of stigma that has to do with contamination anxiety and discomfort with male sexual fluidity. Research published in the Journal of Bisexuality found that bisexual men were perceived by heterosexual participants as being more likely to be HIV-positive, more likely to be sexually predatory, and less reliable as partners — none of which has empirical basis, all of which reflects deep anxiety about non-conforming male sexuality. The idea that men who have sex with men are intrinsically at higher HIV risk, regardless of behavior, is a health messaging failure that has calcified into a social stigma. It was built during the AIDS crisis and has not adequately evolved since. For bisexual men, who may or may not have male sexual partners at any given time, this generalized suspicion follows them regardless of their actual behavior or health status.

From Gay Culture

The reception bisexual men receive in gay spaces has historically been poor, and while it has improved somewhat, it remains uneven. The "bisexual men are actually gay and in denial" narrative persists. Gay men have sometimes argued — explicitly — that bisexuality in men is not a genuine category, only a transitional state on the way to full gay identity. This view received an unexpected boost from a 2005 Northwestern University study that appeared to question whether male bisexuality was a distinct pattern of arousal. A later and more rigorous 2011 study by researchers at Northwestern and the Kinsey Institute directly contradicted these findings, demonstrating clear bisexual arousal patterns in men using objective physiological measures. The second study received a fraction of the attention of the first. The damage from the initial coverage persisted.

The Invisibility Problem

Bisexual men are significantly less likely to be out than either gay men or bisexual women. Research from the Pew Research Center and Williams Institute has documented this consistently. Among those who are out, many report being out to far fewer people than gay men — often only to sexual partners, rarely to family or colleagues. The invisibility is not simply personal preference. It is a rational response to an environment that offers bisexual men relatively little affirming community, high social cost for disclosure, and skepticism from both heterosexual and gay social circles. Invisibility has its own health costs: bisexual men report higher rates of depression and anxiety than either gay or heterosexual men, according to data from the American Journal of Public Health.

A Detour on Biphobia in Media

Film and television have historically handled bisexual men poorly — either making bisexuality a narrative shorthand for untrustworthiness, or erasing it by eventually resolving a bisexual character as definitively gay. The "now he's gay" ending of a story that started with male bisexuality is so common it is almost a genre convention. When bisexual male characters are treated as fully realized people with stable bisexual identities, it is still notably unusual.

What Affirmation Actually Requires

For bisexual men, affirmation requires something specific: not just general LGBTQ+ inclusion, but explicit recognition that male bisexuality is real, that it does not resolve into something else, and that bisexual men belong in queer community without having to earn that belonging through the correct relationship history or by converting to a more legible identity. Research from The Trevor Project found that LGBTQ+ youth who had identity-specific affirmation — not just general acceptance — showed better mental health outcomes. For bisexual men specifically, who face a particular combination of erasure and stigma, the specificity of that affirmation matters. You do not have to defend the reality of your attraction. You do not have to explain why you did not just pick a side. You do not have to perform your bisexuality in a way that satisfies other people's standards. You know who you are. That is sufficient.

Continue the Conversation with Sophie Laurent

✓ Free · No signup required

Post on X Facebook Reddit